Champion sheet · Mid

Syndra

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW
Tournament presence · pick + ban
51.2%#1 of 173 champions
Pick
22.7%picked in 1,635 of 7,217 games
Ban
28.5%1,016 bans over 3,566 games, against 15.8% in soloQ
Win rate as Mid50.7% between 48.6% and 52.8% over 1,511 gamesSoloQ 51.0%: no clear gap
Median length28.9 minsoloQ 27.9 min

Amateur: 7,611 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 376,433 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

  • DraftPicked more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    10.6%
    SoloQ
    5.0%
    10.6% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 5.0% in soloQ.
  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    26.5%
    SoloQ
    15.8%
    26.5% ban rate in amateur play over 2,247 games, against 15.8% in soloQ over 169,540 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    28.9 min
    SoloQ
    27.9 min
    Median of 28.9 min in amateur play, against 27.9 min in soloQ.
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Arcane Comet, then Blackfire Torch, Cosmic Drive, and Rabadon's Deathcap: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesArcane Comet56% · 21,290
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Teleport87% · 32,933
Same in amateur play
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 341 games
Core (3 legendaries)14% · 2,424
14%of soloQ games
  1. Blackfire Torch
  2. Cosmic Drive
  3. Rabadon's Deathcap
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 94% of mid laners.

  1. Crowd control (CC)top6%1.4 · mid laners: 0.7
  2. Team damagetop13%25% · mid laners: 21%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

  • CC
  • Damage
  • Poke

Like other mid laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in mid game
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Map pressure
  • Plays teamfights
  • Takes its kills in duels
  • Lets allies carry kills

What it is not

  • No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 38 in lane, 43 in mid game and 53 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

514-14 vs 528
876-24 vs 899
1,186+8 vs 1,179
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Syndramid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 60% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners
3.1takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 38 of 100 among mid laners514 · median 528
  • Damage in mid game · rank 43 of 100 among mid laners876 · median 899
  • Damage in late game · rank 53 of 100 among mid laners1,186 · median 1,179
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 68 of 100 among mid laners+154 · median +25
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 60 of 100 among mid laners+183 · median +71
  • Map pressure · rank 46 of 100 among mid laners3.1 · median 3.2
  • Absorbs damage · rank 10 of 100 among mid laners292 · median 489
  • Plays teamfights · rank 46 of 100 among mid laners55% · median 55%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 38 of 100 among mid laners21% · median 23%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 53 of 100 among mid lanersrank 53 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 94 of 100 among mid laners1.4 · median 0.7
  • Team damage · rank 88 of 100 among mid laners25% · median 21%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Alistar in amateur play: +13.1 pts over 51 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Ambessa58.4% · expected 50.2% · 89 g+8.2 ptSoloQ -2.5
Camille52.7% · expected 45.1% · 55 g+7.6 ptSoloQ -2.4
Mordekaiser61.3% · expected 52.1% · 31 g+9.2 ptSoloQ +1.9
K'Sante55.2% · expected 51.8% · 87 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +2.2
Gragas62.5% · expected 54.7% · 32 g+7.8 ptSoloQ +2.8
Junglegap to expected
Xin Zhao60.2% · expected 51.6% · 123 g+8.6 ptSoloQ +0.9
Nocturne60.0% · expected 53.9% · 60 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -3.3
Skarner57.5% · expected 53.7% · 40 g+3.8 ptSoloQ +2.0
Qiyana40.7% · expected 39.7% · 54 g+1.0 ptSoloQ +0.1
Cho'Gath50.0% · expected 48.1% · 46 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +0.2
Midgap to expected
Akali59.1% · expected 44.8% · 44 g+14.3 ptSoloQ +1.8
Locke50.0% · expected 45.1% · 96 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -3.7
Ahri51.8% · expected 50.1% · 170 g+1.6 ptSoloQ -0.9
Hwei53.1% · expected 49.1% · 81 g+4.0 ptSoloQ +3.6
Lissandra58.1% · expected 49.3% · 31 g+8.8 ptSoloQ +1.1
ADCgap to expected
Kai'Sa57.8% · expected 53.4% · 102 g+4.4 ptSoloQ -0.6
Sivir57.5% · expected 53.8% · 80 g+3.7 ptSoloQ -0.4
Yunara49.4% · expected 48.4% · 160 g+1.0 ptSoloQ +0.2
Ezreal56.0% · expected 52.6% · 84 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +0.1
Xayah53.8% · expected 50.6% · 80 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +2.4
Supportgap to expected
Alistar62.7% · expected 49.6% · 51 g+13.1 ptSoloQ +0.8
Braum57.3% · expected 52.3% · 131 g+4.9 ptSoloQ -1.2
Nami59.1% · expected 52.7% · 44 g+6.4 ptSoloQ -0.5
Rakan50.0% · expected 48.2% · 78 g+1.8 ptSoloQ -1.6
Bard46.3% · expected 44.4% · 54 g+1.9 ptSoloQ +0.4

With

Topgap to expected
Ornn55.8% · expected 49.5% · 172 g+6.3 ptSoloQ +1.6
K'Sante53.2% · expected 49.6% · 111 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -2.1
Gnar51.4% · expected 48.4% · 74 g+2.9 ptSoloQ -0.8
Malphite45.0% · expected 43.6% · 60 g+1.4 ptSoloQ -0.6
Dr. Mundo43.8% · expected 43.3% · 48 g+0.4 ptSoloQ -2.8
Junglegap to expected
Trundle69.8% · expected 54.1% · 43 g+15.7 ptSoloQ +1.5
Skarner58.2% · expected 47.7% · 67 g+10.5 ptSoloQ -0.7
Nocturne55.6% · expected 47.5% · 36 g+8.1 ptSoloQ -1.6
Cho'Gath53.8% · expected 53.3% · 52 g+0.6 ptSoloQ -1.8
Shyvana52.4% · expected 51.5% · 42 g+0.9 ptSoloQ -0.2
ADCgap to expected
Sivir58.4% · expected 47.6% · 89 g+10.8 ptSoloQ +0.4
Lucian59.1% · expected 49.2% · 66 g+9.9 ptSoloQ +0.1
Jinx53.1% · expected 48.6% · 128 g+4.5 ptSoloQ 0.0
Tristana56.9% · expected 53.7% · 102 g+3.2 ptSoloQ -1.1
Xayah53.8% · expected 50.8% · 104 g+3.0 ptSoloQ +1.0
Supportgap to expected
Lulu52.2% · expected 48.0% · 180 g+4.2 ptSoloQ +0.6
Renata Glasc63.5% · expected 55.1% · 52 g+8.4 ptSoloQ +3.5
Milio52.8% · expected 49.3% · 108 g+3.5 ptSoloQ +0.9
Karma53.0% · expected 48.9% · 83 g+4.1 ptSoloQ +1.4
Rakan54.7% · expected 53.2% · 95 g+1.5 ptSoloQ -0.5

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top25 champions
  • Ornn158 games
    48.1%gap -3.8 ptsSoloQ: 49.3% · 1,096 g
  • Ambessa89 games
    58.4%gap +8.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.2% · 994 g
  • K'Sante87 games
    55.2%gap +3.3 ptsSoloQ: 55.9% · 777 g
  • Sion83 games
    47.0%gap -2.9 ptsSoloQ: 49.4% · 773 g
  • Renekton71 games
    45.1%gap -2.4 ptsSoloQ: 52.4% · 1,014 g
Jungle22 champions
  • Wukong255 games
    46.7%gap -4.4 ptsSoloQ: 48.6% · 1,527 g
  • Jarvan IV177 games
    49.2%gap -2.1 ptsSoloQ: 52.2% · 1,395 g
  • Xin Zhao123 games
    60.2%gap +8.6 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 458 g
  • Vi105 games
    48.6%gap -1.5 ptsSoloQ: 50.6% · 607 g
  • Nocturne60 games
    60.0%gap +6.1 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 417 g
Mid19 champions
  • Viktor210 games
    50.5%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.5% · 2,185 g
  • Ahri170 games
    51.8%gap +1.6 ptsSoloQ: 48.7% · 2,520 g
  • Orianna138 games
    48.6%gap -0.9 ptsSoloQ: 53.8% · 1,041 g
  • Locke96 games
    50.0%gap +4.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.2% · 1,706 g
  • Hwei81 games
    53.1%gap +4.0 ptsSoloQ: 54.2% · 933 g
ADC18 champions
  • Yunara160 games
    49.4%gap +1.0 ptsSoloQ: 51.0% · 3,007 g
  • Jinx145 games
    47.6%gap -5.2 ptsSoloQ: 48.9% · 2,335 g
  • Caitlyn111 games
    48.6%gap +0.4 ptsSoloQ: 54.4% · 2,121 g
  • Ashe103 games
    50.5%gap -2.5 ptsSoloQ: 50.4% · 849 g
  • Kai'Sa102 games
    57.8%gap +4.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.7% · 2,933 g
Support17 champions
  • Lulu175 games
    52.0%gap -1.3 ptsSoloQ: 52.1% · 2,960 g
  • Nautilus163 games
    47.2%gap 0.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.3% · 2,172 g
  • Braum131 games
    57.3%gap +4.9 ptsSoloQ: 47.9% · 1,341 g
  • Seraphine101 games
    47.5%gap -5.1 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 886 g
  • Milio99 games
    47.5%gap -4.6 ptsSoloQ: 54.6% · 1,176 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Priority pick: taken in G1, burned afterwards.

Pick rate as Mid

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+5.0%37,561 picks of 752,860ban 15.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments10.6%1,172 picks of 11,050ban 26.5% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro10.9%245 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

38.9% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Mid
  • 29.2%G1647 games of 2,215
  • 14.4%G2319 games of 2,215
  • 11.4%G3+81 games of 713
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 647 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.