Champion sheet · Mid

Lissandra

Patches 16.19 to 16.21 · EUW

Tournament presence · pick + ban

10.3%#72 of 173 champions

Pick: 5.1%picked in 368 of 7,218 games
Ban: 5.2%186 bans over 3,566 games, against 2.7% in soloQ

Win rate as Mid51.4% between 47.0% and 55.8% over 352 gamesSoloQ 50.7%: no clear gap

Median length28.9 minsoloQ 27.8 min

Amateur: 6,931 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, EUW. SoloQ Master+: 376,433 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.

What changes in tournaments3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.DraftLength
How to play itElectrocute, then Malignance, Shadowflame, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.
In a compCrowd control (CC) first: more CC than 98% of mid laners.Map pressureTeamfightCC
With / againstNo opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.
In draftFallback pick: comes out late in the series, once the pool has emptied.

01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Mid.

DraftPicked more often in amateur play
Amateur
2.4%
SoloQ
2.1%
2.4% of the role's picks in amateur play, against 2.1% in soloQ.
DraftBanned more often in amateur play
Amateur
5.6%
SoloQ
2.7%
5.6% ban rate in amateur play over 2,247 games, against 2.7% in soloQ over 169,540 games.
LengthLonger games in amateur play
Amateur
28.9 min
SoloQ
27.8 min
Median of 28.9 min in amateur play, against 27.8 min in soloQ.

02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Electrocute, then Malignance, Shadowflame, and Zhonya's Hourglass: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block

RunesElectrocute59% · 9,599

Amateur: Arcane Comet (48%), gap not settled

SpellsFlash + Teleport62% · 10,064

Same in amateur play

SkillsQnot collected in soloQ

Amateur: 99% · 70 games

Core (3 legendaries)25% · 1,741

25%of soloQ games

Malignance
Shadowflame
Zhonya's Hourglass

Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Crowd control (CC) first: more CC than 98% of mid laners.

Crowd control (CC)top2%1.6 · mid laners: 0.7
Plays teamfightstop15%59% · mid laners: 55%
Map pressuretop18%4 · mid laners: 3.2

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

What marks it

Map pressure
Teamfight
CC

Like other mid laners

Damage in lane
Damage in mid game
Damage in late game
Gold at 15 min
Absorbs damage
Lets allies carry kills
Team damage

What it is not

Few duels
No poke
No split-push

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 31 in lane, 41 in mid game and 36 in late game, out of 100 mid laners.

505-23 vs 528

868-31 vs 899

1,146-32 vs 1,179

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Lissandramid laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, behind 75% of mid laners against the direct opponent.

mid laners

4takedowns outside its lane before 15 min; mid laners: 3.2.

Where it stands among mid laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100

Damage in lane · rank 31 of 100 among mid laners505 · median 528
Damage in mid game · rank 41 of 100 among mid laners868 · median 899
Damage in late game · rank 36 of 100 among mid laners1,146 · median 1,179
Gold at 15 min · rank 28 of 100 among mid laners-171 · median +25
Gold at 20 min · rank 25 of 100 among mid laners-297 · median +71
Map pressure · rank 82 of 100 among mid laners4 · median 3.2
Absorbs damage · rank 37 of 100 among mid laners408 · median 489
Plays teamfights · rank 85 of 100 among mid laners59% · median 55%
Takes its kills in duels · rank 25 of 100 among mid laners19% · median 23%
Lets allies carry kills · rank 62 of 100 among mid lanersrank 62 of 100
Crowd control (CC) · rank 98 of 100 among mid laners1.6 · median 0.7
Team damage · rank 51 of 100 among mid laners21% · median 21%

04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

No opponent with a clear gap to expected in amateur play: win rates remain ranges.

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Vi58.3% · expected 50.7% · 36 g+7.6 ptSoloQ +3.2

Jarvan IV58.1% · expected 51.9% · 43 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +0.8

Midgap to expected

Ahri58.3% · expected 50.9% · 60 g+7.5 ptSoloQ 0.0

ADCgap to expected

Jinx63.3% · expected 53.5% · 30 g+9.8 ptSoloQ -1.3

Supportgap to expected

Lulu60.6% · expected 54.1% · 33 g+6.5 ptSoloQ 0.0

With

Topgap to expected

No positive gap in amateur play.

Junglegap to expected

Jarvan IV65.1% · expected 50.9% · 43 g+14.2 ptSoloQ -3.4

Wukong52.8% · expected 51.1% · 53 g+1.7 ptSoloQ -4.7

ADCgap to expected

Jinx52.9% · expected 49.3% · 34 g+3.6 ptSoloQ +2.6

Supportgap to expected

Braum55.6% · expected 49.8% · 36 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +2.0

Milio56.3% · expected 50.1% · 32 g+6.2 ptSoloQ +1.2

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by

Top20 champions